When in the early fifties during one of the UNESCO sponsored conferences some voices from Europe and Asia began to raise previously unidentified issue, a threat of so-called demographic bomb with destructive potential exceeding that of thousands of nuclear weapons. A call for action was largely ignored by the world ruling elites basking in its economic success on the ruins of WWII and happily choking on smoke of their greatness. Proponents of urgent action argued that within several decades, the trajectory of exponential growth of the world population would have been unsupportable even by the entire world’s natural resources.
Throughout centuries engineers had to face reality of balancing their professional, technical and scientific judgments with governmental laws/regulations and policies, business/corporate profits and investment interests, technological capabilities and local environmental and economical community needs. In order to keep this balance most of engineers were trained within widest possible engineering breath encompassing all aspects of engineering issues and projects including construction and exploitation phases as well as long-term impact on ecosystem, from point of view of ethics and methodology of natural sciences. Especially emphasizing ethical interpretation of engineering assessment uncertainties.